General Comments from Prior Application Cycles
Following the Fulbright application review panels, I asked all interviewers to relate the most commonly
observed problems on their panel. The following digest enumerates those comments. Curiously, this list is
strikingly similar to lists from past years. Your awareness of these pitfalls at the beginning of your
application will help you avoid them.
_______________________________________________!
1. Clarify your research question or agenda. Many, many applicants articulated their projects
and presented themselves more effectively orally than in writing. Read your proposal aloud.
This will help you identify the sections that don’t work. (This was the number one
comment!!)
2. Urgency --
Why do YOU need to go to this COUNTRY at this TIME?
3. Weak writing in general, but particularly in the introduction. Be succinct and use
transparent organization to present your ideas clearly. Rid your writing of the passive voice.
Also examine all words ending in “-in
g” and “-tion” to see whether they can be turned into
active verbs. Have agents accomplish actions in your proposal. Identify the problem that
needs your attenti
on.
4. All research must answer a simple, two-word
question, “So what?” (Alt. “Who cares?”) Dig
to the heart of your project to discover what your research will contribute to your field,
knowledge, and/or the world. Why do we need you to carry out this work? Most appl
icants
were good and articulating “WHAT”, moderately good and clarifying “HOW
”, but poor at
saying “WHY”.
5. Fix poorly developed me
t
hodology/research plan/timeline (this is a killer!).
6. Scope of project: overly ambitious or (less frequently) ridiculously narrow. Projects must be
feasible (in a general sense) and achievable (in the time you have and with your ski
l
l
s and
resources.) One interviewer seeks “a more simplified, focused, and detailed version of their
vision.” (Hint: A timeline often helps you trim/expand your project to a feasible size.)
7. Poorly
developed link between your interests (who you are) and the project. (Hint: Fulbright
funds not only good research, they fund good researchers. It is very important that you
come through in the materials.) And so …….
8. DO NOT reiterate y
our project proposal in your personal statement!! The personal statement
is your chance to tell them what makes you tick, not plow the project field again.
9. Organization: Specifics over details; show don’t tell; move from the general to the focused;
introduction must captivate reader and give them reason to read on.
10. Lack of seriousness regarding foreign language. NB – Language is a key washout point in
Fulbright. On every panel sits someone extremely proud of his/her language abilities and
unimpressed with yours. You must get this person in your camp before you move forward.
11. Abstracts: DO NOT cut and paste from your first paragraph. Seek guidance is uncertain how
to write a good abstract.
12. Avoid colloquial or overly flowery language in your proposal. You do not want to appear
blasé, or “silly and pretentious.”